linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (drivetemp) Avoid SCT usage on Toshiba DT01ACA family drives

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <180bb209-7e65-d0c9-4c7f-e16e976f5cd4@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:47:07 +0200
From:   "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (drivetemp) Avoid SCT usage on Toshiba DT01ACA
 family drives

On 14.07.2020 19:14, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 7/14/20 7:11 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> On 14.07.2020 16:02, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> On 7/11/20 1:41 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>>>> It has been observed that Toshiba DT01ACA family drives have
>>>> WRITE FPDMA QUEUED command timeouts and sometimes just freeze until
>>>> power-cycled under heavy write loads when their temperature is getting
>>>> polled in SCT mode. The SMART mode seems to be fine, though.
>>>>
>>>> Let's make sure we don't use SCT mode for these drives then.
>>>>
>>>> While only the 3 TB model was actually caught exhibiting the problem let's
>>>> play safe here to avoid data corruption and extend the ban to the whole
>>>> family.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 5b46903d8bf3 ("hwmon: Driver for disk and solid state drives with temperature sensors")
>>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Notes:
>>>>     This behavior was observed on two different DT01ACA3 drives.
>>>>     
>>>>     Usually, a series of queued WRITE FPDMA QUEUED commands just time out,
>>>>     but sometimes the whole drive freezes. Merely disconnecting and
>>>>     reconnecting SATA interface cable then does not unfreeze the drive.
>>>>     
>>>>     One has to disconnect and reconnect the drive power connector for the
>>>>     drive to be detected again (suggesting the drive firmware itself has
>>>>     crashed).
>>>>     
>>>>     This only happens when the drive temperature is polled very often (like
>>>>     every second), so occasional SCT usage via smartmontools is probably
>>>>     safe.
>>>>     
>>>>     Changes from v1:
>>>>     'SCT blacklist' -> 'SCT avoid models'
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/hwmon/drivetemp.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/drivetemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/drivetemp.c
>>>> index 0d4f3d97ffc6..da9cfcbecc96 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/drivetemp.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/drivetemp.c
>>>> @@ -285,6 +285,36 @@ static int drivetemp_get_scttemp(struct drivetemp_data *st, u32 attr, long *val)
>>>>  	return err;
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>> +static const char * const sct_avoid_models[] = {
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * These drives will have WRITE FPDMA QUEUED command timeouts and sometimes just
>>>> + * freeze until power-cycled under heavy write loads when their temperature is
>>>> + * getting polled in SCT mode. The SMART mode seems to be fine, though.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * While only the 3 TB model was actually caught exhibiting the problem
>>>> + * let's play safe here to avoid data corruption and ban the whole family.
>>>> + */
>>>> +	"TOSHIBA DT01ACA0",
>>>> +	"TOSHIBA DT01ACA1",
>>>> +	"TOSHIBA DT01ACA2",
>>>> +	"TOSHIBA DT01ACA3",
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static bool drivetemp_sct_avoid(struct drivetemp_data *st)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = st->sdev;
>>>> +	unsigned int ctr;
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (!sdev->model)
>>>> +		return false;
>>>> +
>>>> +	for (ctr = 0; ctr < ARRAY_SIZE(sct_avoid_models); ctr++)
>>>> +		if (strncmp(sdev->model, sct_avoid_models[ctr], 16) == 0)
>>>
>>> Why strncmp, and why length 16 ? Both strings are, as far as I can see,
>>> 0 terminated. A fixed length only asks for trouble later on as more models
>>> are added to the list.
>>
>> The first 16 bytes of sdev->model contain the model number, the rest
>> seems to be the drive serial number.
>> There is no NULL separator between them.
>>
> 
> If the "16" is based on some SCSI standard, there should be
> a define for it somewhere. 

The "model" field seems to contain just the raw SCSI INQUIRY
"product identification" field, which is space-filled to 16 bytes, but
is not NULL-terminated.

The SCSI layer seems to just open-code the number 16 everywhere, can't
see any specific define for this.

> Otherwise, the comparison should
> use strlen(sct_avoid_models[ctr]) and explain the reason.
> In the latter case, it might possibly make sense to match
> "TOSHIBA DT01ACA" to also catch later models.

Will use strlen() for prefix matching and match on the
"TOSHIBA DT01ACA" prefix then.

> Thanks,
> Guenter

Thanks,
Maciej