[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202007131715.5598282C@keescook>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:16:03 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
willy@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, gofmanp@...il.com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, shuah@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kernel: Implement selective syscall userspace
redirection
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 12:45:15AM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Introduce a mechanism to quickly disable/enable syscall handling for a
> specific process and redirect to userspace via SIGSYS. This is useful
> for processes with parts that require syscall redirection and parts that
> don't, but who need to perform this boundary crossing really fast,
> without paying the cost of a system call to reconfigure syscall handling
> on each boundary transition. This is particularly important for Windows
> games running over Wine.
>
> The proposed interface looks like this:
>
> prctl(PR_SET_SYSCALL_USER_DISPATCH, <op>, <start_addr>, <end_addr>, [selector])
>
> The range [<start_addr>,<end_addr>] is a part of the process memory map
> that is allowed to by-pass the redirection code and dispatch syscalls
> directly, such that in fast paths a process doesn't need to disable the
> trap nor the kernel has to check the selector. This is essential to
> return from SIGSYS to a blocked area without triggering another SIGSYS
> from rt_sigreturn.
>
> selector is an optional pointer to a char-sized userspace memory region
> that has a key switch for the mechanism. This key switch is set to
> either PR_SYS_DISPATCH_ON, PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF to enable and disable the
> redirection without calling the kernel.
>
> The feature is meant to be set per-thread and it is disabled on
> fork/clone/execv.
>
> Internally, this doesn't add overhead to the syscall hot path, and it
> requires very little per-architecture support. I avoided using seccomp,
> even though it duplicates some functionality, due to previous feedback
> that maybe it shouldn't mix with seccomp since it is not a security
> mechanism. And obviously, this should never be considered a security
> mechanism, since any part of the program can by-pass it by using the
> syscall dispatcher.
>
> For the sysinfo benchmark, which measures the overhead added to
> executing a native syscall that doesn't require interception, the
> overhead using only the direct dispatcher region to issue syscalls is
> pretty much irrelevant. The overhead of using the selector goes around
> 40ns for a native (unredirected) syscall in my system, and it is (as
> expected) dominated by the supervisor-mode user-address access. In
> fact, with SMAP off, the overhead is consistently less than 5ns on my
> test box.
>
> Right now, it is only supported by x86_64 and x86, but it should be
> easily enabled for other architectures.
>
> An example code using this interface can be found at:
> https://gitlab.collabora.com/krisman/syscall-disable-personality
>
> Changes since v2:
> (Matthew Wilcox suggestions)
> - Drop __user on non-ptr type.
> - Move #define closer to similar defs
> - Allow a memory region that can dispatch directly
> (Kees Cook suggestions)
> - Improve kconfig summary line
> - Move flag cleanup on execve to begin_new_exec
> - Hint branch predictor in the syscall path
> (Me)
> - Convert selector to char
>
> Changes since RFC:
> (Kees Cook suggestions)
> - Don't mention personality while explaining the feature
> - Use syscall_get_nr
> - Remove header guard on several places
> - Convert WARN_ON to WARN_ON_ONCE
> - Explicit check for state values
> - Rename to syscall user dispatcher
>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paul Gofman <gofmanp@...il.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
I think this looks great. :)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Any other folks able to look through it?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists