[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714183512.GA18816@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 20:35:12 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 4.19.132-rt59
Hi!
>
> I'm pleased to announce the 4.19.132-rt59 stable release.
>
> This release is just an update to the new stable 4.19.132
> version and no RT specific changes have been made.
>
> You can get this release via the git tree at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-stable-rt.git
>
> branch: v4.19-rt
> Head SHA1: 1eebf4069aa37e54330cce9a42608517ea6996fe
>
> Or to build 4.19.132-rt59 directly, the following patches should be
> applied:
Thanks a lot.
But now I am confused, I completely missed announcements for
v4.19.127-rt55 to v4.19.131-rt58.
And for example -rt56 is not listed in
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/4.19/older/sha256sums.asc
...aha, and the versions do not have signed tags, either:
pavel@amd:~/cip/k$ git show v4.19.131-rt58
fatal: ambiguous argument 'v4.19.131-rt58': unknown revision or path not in the working tree.
Is that because they were created just as quick steps towards -rt59?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists