[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200714195035.1426873-6-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:50:31 -0600
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/9] remoteproc: Introducing function rproc_validate()
Add a new function to assert the general health of the remote
processor before handing it to the remoteproc core.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
Tested-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index fd424662801f..ad500c291d5f 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2040,6 +2040,43 @@ struct rproc *rproc_get_by_phandle(phandle phandle)
#endif
EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_get_by_phandle);
+static int rproc_validate(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+ switch (rproc->state) {
+ case RPROC_OFFLINE:
+ /*
+ * An offline processor without a start()
+ * function makes no sense.
+ */
+ if (!rproc->ops->start)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ case RPROC_DETACHED:
+ /*
+ * A remote processor in a detached state without an
+ * attach() function makes not sense.
+ */
+ if (!rproc->ops->attach)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * When attaching to a remote processor the device memory
+ * is already available and as such there is no need to have a
+ * cached table.
+ */
+ if (rproc->cached_table)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ break;
+ default:
+ /*
+ * When adding a remote processor, the state of the device
+ * can be offline or detached, nothing else.
+ */
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/**
* rproc_add() - register a remote processor
* @rproc: the remote processor handle to register
@@ -2069,6 +2106,10 @@ int rproc_add(struct rproc *rproc)
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
+ ret = rproc_validate(rproc);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
dev_info(dev, "%s is available\n", rproc->name);
/* create debugfs entries */
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists