linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] pinctrl: mediatek: avoid virtual gpio trying to set reg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGp9LzpbSjJ2f=rKMhfsrgXcVgiWzmyMvcXfrMmxBchezARNag@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 13:39:24 -0700
From:   Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@...iatek.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        mtk01761 <wendell.lin@...iatek.com>,
        Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, wsd_upstream@...iatek.com,
        CC Hwang <cc.hwang@...iatek.com>,
        Loda Chou <loda.chou@...iatek.com>,
        Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] pinctrl: mediatek: avoid virtual gpio trying to
 set reg

> > Sean if you're OK with this patch I can just apply it separately.
>
> Ah nevermind since the next patch has your ACK I just applied this
> too since it's a dependency. Yell if this is wrong.

The patch looks good to me too.
By the way, I didn't see those applied patches in for-next branch yet
I just think Hanks should send those patch based on the top if he has
the next version

>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij