[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <566faf7eeec336d0ecfa9bd16790d6e3042b9267.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 23:25:35 +0000
From: "Westergreen, Dalon" <dalon.westergreen@...el.com>
To: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
"Tan, Ley Foon" <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
"See, Chin Liang" <chin.liang.see@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Dinh" <dinh.nguyen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Ooi, Joyce" <joyce.ooi@...el.com>,
"thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com" <thor.thayer@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/10] net: eth: altera: add msgdma prefetcher
On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 13:23 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Westergreen, Dalon" <dalon.westergreen@...el.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 18:51:15 +0000
>
> > I don't think this is necessary, i think just having a module parameter
> > meets our needs. I don't see a need for the value to change on a per
> > interface basis. This was primarily used during testing / bringup.
>
> Please no module parameters...
I think we are fine just hard coding the value. that seems to be the best path
forward.
--dalon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists