lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200714061654.GE183694@krava>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 08:16:54 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 12:22:47PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> tmp/ccsqpVCY.s: Assembler messages:
> tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:78: Error: unrecognized symbol type ""
> tmp/ccsqpVCY.s:91: Error: unrecognized symbol type ""
> 
> I don't know what has caused this (I guess maybe the resolve_btfids
> branch).
> 
> I have used the bpf-next tree from next-20200713 for today.

ok, trying to reproduce

thanks,
jirka

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ