[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200714012732.195466-1-yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:27:32 -0400
From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] bpf: Fix NULL pointer dereference in __btf_resolve_helper_id()
Prevent __btf_resolve_helper_id() from dereferencing `btf_vmlinux`
as NULL. This patch fixes the following syzbot bug:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=5edd146856fd513747c1992442732e5a0e9ba355
Reported-by: syzbot+ee09bda7017345f1fbe6@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
---
Thank you for reviewing my patch! I am new to Linux kernel development; would
the log message and errno be appropriate for this case?
Change in v2:
- Split NULL and IS_ERR cases.
kernel/bpf/btf.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index 30721f2c2d10..092116a311f4 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -4088,6 +4088,11 @@ static int __btf_resolve_helper_id(struct bpf_verifier_log *log, void *fn,
const char *tname, *sym;
u32 btf_id, i;
+ if (!btf_vmlinux) {
+ bpf_log(log, "btf_vmlinux doesn't exist\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (IS_ERR(btf_vmlinux)) {
bpf_log(log, "btf_vmlinux is malformed\n");
return -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists