linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: lp87565: convert to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fda84ebc-a484-fa88-3bdf-00a4272512e7@lucaceresoli.net>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:26:17 +0200
From:   Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: mfd: lp87565: convert to yaml

Hi Rob,

On 13/07/20 21:01, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 10:43:27PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> The definition of "xxx-in-supply" was generic, thus define in detail the
>> possible cases for each chip variant.
>>
>> Also document that the only possible I2C slave address is 0x60 as per the
>> datasheet and fix the second example accordingly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>

[...]

>> +allOf:
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - ti,lp87565
>> +              - ti,lp87565-q1
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        buck10-in-supply:
>> +          description:
>> +            Phandle to parent supply node for BUCK0 and BUCK1 converters.
>> +
>> +        buck23-in-supply:
>> +          description:
>> +            Phandle to parent supply node for BUCK2 and BUCK3 converters.
>> +
>> +      required:
>> +        - buck10-in-supply
>> +        - buck23-in-supply
>> +
>> +  - if:
>> +      properties:
>> +        compatible:
>> +          contains:
>> +            enum:
>> +              - ti,lp87561-q1
>> +    then:
>> +      properties:
>> +        buck3210-in-supply:
>> +          description:
>> +            Phandle to parent supply node for all the four BUCK converters.
>> +
>> +      required:
>> +        - buck3210-in-supply
> 
> I think this should probably be 2 schema documents (and a 3rd for the 
> next patch)...

No problem, will do.

Is there a specific rule to know when to split, or is it just when the
amount of changes is relevant?

>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    /* TI LP87565-Q1 PMIC (dual 2-phase output configuration) */
>> +    i2c@0 {
>> +        reg = <0x0 0x100>;
>> +        #address-cells = <1>;
>> +        #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> +        pmic@60 {
>> +            compatible = "ti,lp87565-q1";
>> +            reg = <0x60>;
>> +            gpio-controller;
>> +            #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> +
>> +            buck10-in-supply = <&vsys_3v3>;
>> +            buck23-in-supply = <&vsys_3v3>;
>> +
>> +            regulators {
>> +                buck10_reg: buck10 {
> 
> The regulators also need to be documented.

OK.

-- 
Luca