[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4abe7959-3c69-7b05-e9af-565957bafbcd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:36:51 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: tegra: pll: Improve PLLM enable-state detection
14.07.2020 11:20, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 09/07/2020 18:20, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> Power Management Controller (PMC) can override the PLLM clock settings,
>> including the enable-state. Although PMC could only act as a second level
>> gate, meaning that PLLM needs to be enabled by the Clock and Reset
>> Controller (CaR) anyways if we want it to be enabled. Hence, when PLLM is
>> overridden by PMC, it needs to be enabled by CaR and ungated by PMC in
>> order to be functional. Please note that this patch doesn't fix any known
>> problem, and thus, it's merely a minor improvement.
>>
>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20191210120909.GA2703785@ulmo/T/
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v4: - Renamed pllm_pmc_clk_enabled() to pllm_clk_is_gated_by_pmc() as
>> it was suggested by Jon Hunter in the review comment to v3.
>>
>> v3: - Dropped unintended code change that was accidentally added to v2.
>>
>> v2: - Added clarifying comment to the code.
>>
>> - Prettified the code.
>>
>> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
>> index b2d39a66f0fa..ff13b371e176 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c
>> @@ -327,16 +327,26 @@ int tegra_pll_wait_for_lock(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll)
>> return clk_pll_wait_for_lock(pll);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool pllm_clk_is_gated_by_pmc(struct tegra_clk_pll *pll)
>> +{
>> + u32 val = readl_relaxed(pll->pmc + PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE);
>> +
>> + return (val & PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE_PLLM_OVERRIDE) &&
>> + !(val & PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE_PLLM_ENABLE);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int clk_pll_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
>> {
>> struct tegra_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
>> u32 val;
>>
>> - if (pll->params->flags & TEGRA_PLLM) {
>> - val = readl_relaxed(pll->pmc + PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE);
>> - if (val & PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE_PLLM_OVERRIDE)
>> - return val & PMC_PLLP_WB0_OVERRIDE_PLLM_ENABLE ? 1 : 0;
>> - }
>> + /*
>> + * Power Management Controller (PMC) can override the PLLM clock
>> + * settings, including the enable-state. The PLLM is enabled when
>> + * PLLM's CaR state is ON and when PLLM isn't gated by PMC.
>> + */
>> + if ((pll->params->flags & TEGRA_PLLM) && pllm_clk_is_gated_by_pmc(pll))
>> + return 0;
>>
>> val = pll_readl_base(pll);
>
>
> Thanks! This looks good to me. However, I just want to do a bit of
> testing on Tegra124 (hopefully this week).
Okay, thank you :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists