[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72b84dca-e285-bb1f-1b69-5b29c70806d8@cambridgegreys.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:43:40 +0100
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>
To: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>, johannes.berg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] um: some fixes to build UML with musl
On 14/07/2020 11:23, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:40 AM Anton Ivanov
> <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/07/2020 09:52, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
>>> musl toolchain and headers are a bit more strict. These fixes enable building
>>> UML with musl as well as seem not to break on glibc.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c | 1 +
>>> arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c | 12 ++++++------
>>> arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/um/drivers/vector_user.c | 4 +---
>>> arch/um/os-Linux/util.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c | 2 +-
>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c
>>> index 3695821d06a2..785baedc3555 100644
>>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c
>>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/daemon_user.c
>>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>> */
>>>
>>> #include <stdint.h>
>>> +#include <string.h>
>>> #include <unistd.h>
>>> #include <errno.h>
>>> #include <sys/types.h>
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c
>>> index bbd20638788a..52ddda3e3b10 100644
>>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c
>>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/pcap_user.c
>>> @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int pcap_user_init(void *data, void *dev)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> -static int pcap_open(void *data)
>>> +static int pcap_user_open(void *data)
>>
>> This change in the function name was introduced on purpose to avoid name clash in some version of libpcap which export pcap_open
>
> Yes
>
>>
>>
>>> {
>>> struct pcap_data *pri = data;
>>> __u32 netmask;
>>> @@ -44,14 +44,14 @@ static int pcap_open(void *data)
>>> if (pri->filter != NULL) {
>>> err = dev_netmask(pri->dev, &netmask);
>>> if (err < 0) {
>>> - printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_open : dev_netmask failed\n");
>>> + printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_user_open : dev_netmask failed\n");
>>> return -EIO;
>>> }
>>>
>>> pri->compiled = uml_kmalloc(sizeof(struct bpf_program),
>>> UM_GFP_KERNEL);
>>> if (pri->compiled == NULL) {
>>> - printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_open : kmalloc failed\n");
>>> + printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_user_open : kmalloc failed\n");
>>> return -ENOMEM;
>>> }
>>>
>>> @@ -59,14 +59,14 @@ static int pcap_open(void *data)
>>> (struct bpf_program *) pri->compiled,
>>> pri->filter, pri->optimize, netmask);
>>> if (err < 0) {
>>> - printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_open : pcap_compile failed - "
>>> + printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_user_open : pcap_compile failed - "
>>> "'%s'\n", pcap_geterr(pri->pcap));
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>>
>>> err = pcap_setfilter(pri->pcap, pri->compiled);
>>> if (err < 0) {
>>> - printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_open : pcap_setfilter "
>>> + printk(UM_KERN_ERR "pcap_user_open : pcap_setfilter "
>>> "failed - '%s'\n", pcap_geterr(pri->pcap));
>>> goto out;
>>> }
>>> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ int pcap_user_read(int fd, void *buffer, int len, struct pcap_data *pri)
>>>
>>> const struct net_user_info pcap_user_info = {
>>> .init = pcap_user_init,
>>> - .open = pcap_open,
>>> + .open = pcap_user_open,
>>> .close = NULL,
>>> .remove = pcap_remove,
>>> .add_address = NULL,
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c
>>> index 8016d32b6809..482a19c5105c 100644
>>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c
>>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/slip_user.c
>>> @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
>>> #include <errno.h>
>>> #include <fcntl.h>
>>> #include <string.h>
>>> -#include <sys/termios.h>
>>> +#include <termios.h>
>>> #include <sys/wait.h>
>>> #include <net_user.h>
>>> #include <os.h>
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/drivers/vector_user.c b/arch/um/drivers/vector_user.c
>>> index c4a0f26b2824..45d4164ad355 100644
>>> --- a/arch/um/drivers/vector_user.c
>>> +++ b/arch/um/drivers/vector_user.c
>>> @@ -18,9 +18,7 @@
>>> #include <fcntl.h>
>>> #include <sys/socket.h>
>>> #include <sys/un.h>
>>> -#include <net/ethernet.h>
>>> #include <netinet/ip.h>
>>> -#include <netinet/ether.h>
>>> #include <linux/if_ether.h>
>>> #include <linux/if_packet.h>
>>> #include <sys/wait.h>
>>> @@ -332,7 +330,7 @@ static struct vector_fds *user_init_unix_fds(struct arglist *ifspec, int id)
>>> }
>>> switch (id) {
>>> case ID_BESS:
>>> - if (connect(fd, remote_addr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_un)) < 0) {
>>> + if (connect(fd, (const struct sockaddr *) remote_addr, sizeof(struct sockaddr_un)) < 0) {
>>> printk(UM_KERN_ERR "bess open:cannot connect to %s %i", remote_addr->sun_path, -errno);
>>> goto unix_cleanup;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/arch/um/os-Linux/util.c b/arch/um/os-Linux/util.c
>>> index ecf2f390fad2..07327425d06e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/um/os-Linux/util.c
>>> +++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/util.c
>>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>>> #include <signal.h>
>>> #include <string.h>
>>> #include <termios.h>
>>> -#include <wait.h>
>>> +#include <sys/wait.h>
>>> #include <sys/mman.h>
>>> #include <sys/utsname.h>
>>> #include <init.h>
>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c b/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> index c51dd8363d25..bae61554abcc 100644
>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/user-offsets.c
>>> @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>> #include <stddef.h>
>>> #include <signal.h>
>>> -#include <sys/poll.h>
>>> +#include <poll.h>
>>> #include <sys/mman.h>
>>> #include <sys/user.h>
>>> #define __FRAME_OFFSETS
>>>
>>
>> Apologies for the delay in answering, I was buried under OVS for the last month or so.
>>
>> With the exception of this patch the rest of the series looks OK. Can you please resumbit and if Johannes and Richard are OK with it I will +1 it.
>
> I didn't quite understand how I should improve this patch. Could you,
> please, clarify?
Sorry, not reading it correctly :)
My fault. You actually did exactly what has been in the queue for a while after Brendan noticed it: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/5/868
Patch is OK with me, should not read patches before the 3rd double espresso next time.
I will +1 it, Richard, Johannes, what do you think?
Thanks,
>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> --
>> Anton R. Ivanov
>> Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
>> https://www.cambridgegreys.com/
>
--
Anton R. Ivanov
Cambridgegreys Limited. Registered in England. Company Number 10273661
https://www.cambridgegreys.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists