linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] reiserfs : fix improper free in reiserfs_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jul 2020 06:12:47 -0700
From:   Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     jack@...e.cz, william.kucharski@...cle.com, jeffm@...e.com,
        joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com, liao.pingfang@....com.cn,
        reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] reiserfs : fix improper free in reiserfs_get_block


On 7/14/20 6:10 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 06:05:09AM -0700, trix@...hat.com wrote:
>> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>>
>> clang static analysis flags this error
>>
>> inode.c:1083:5: warning: Argument to kfree() is the address of the
>>   local variable 'unf_single', which is not memory allocated by
>>   malloc() [unix.Malloc]
>>                                 kfree(un);
>>                                 ^~~~~~~~~
>> Assignment of 'un'
>>
>> 	/*
>> 	 * We use this in case we need to allocate
>> 	 * only one block which is a fastpath
>> 	 */
>> 	unp_t unf_single = 0;
>>
>> 	...
>>
>> 	if (blocks_needed == 1) {
>> 		un = &unf_single;
>> 	} else {
>> 		un = kcalloc(min(blocks_needed, max_to_insert),
>> 			     UNFM_P_SIZE, GFP_NOFS);
>> 		if (!un) {
>> 			un = &unf_single;
>> 			blocks_needed = 1;
>> 			max_to_insert = 0;
>> 		}
>> 	}
>>
>> The logic to free 'un'
>>
>> 	if (blocks_needed != 1)
>> 		kfree(un);
>>
>> Because the kcalloc failure falls back to using unf_single,
>> the if-check for the free is wrong.
> I think you mean "Because clang's static analysis is limited, it
> warns incorrectly about this".  There's no path to get to the
> kfree with blocks_needed != 1 and un being equal to &unf_single.

Ok.


>> So improve the check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/reiserfs/inode.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> index 1509775da040..4d62148e43e6 100644
>> --- a/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/inode.c
>> @@ -1079,7 +1079,7 @@ int reiserfs_get_block(struct inode *inode, sector_t block,
>>  						     UNFM_P_SIZE *
>>  						     blocks_needed);
>>  
>> -			if (blocks_needed != 1)
>> +			if (un != &unf_single)
>>  				kfree(un);
> I don't actually object to this patch, but your analysis of clang's
> analysis is wrong.
>