linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow selecting arbitrary clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:46:38 -0700
From:   Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
To:     Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: fsl_asrc: allow selecting arbitrary clocks

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 06:18:38PM +0200, Arnaud Ferraris wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Le 15/07/2020 à 16:05, Mark Brown a écrit :
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 01:50:50PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Anything wrong with ASRC selecting SSI1 clock for both cases? The
> > driver calculates the divisors based on the given clock rate, so
> > the final internal rate should be the same. If there's a problem,
> > I feel that's a separate bug.
> 
> Calculations are indeed good, but then the clock selection setting in
> the ASRCSR register would also use SSI1 as the input clock, which
> doesn't work in our case.

Could you please elaborate why it doesn't work?