linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net/9p: validate fds in p9_fd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200715.142459.1215411672362681844.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 14:24:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     asmadeus@...ewreck.org
Cc:     hch@....de, nazard@...ar.ca, ericvh@...il.com, lucho@...kov.net,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+e6f77e16ff68b2434a2c@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/9p: validate fds in p9_fd_open

From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 15:47:56 +0200

> It's honestly just a warn on something that would fail anyway so I'd
> rather let it live in -next first, I don't get why syzbot is so verbose
> about this - it sent a mail when it found a c repro and one more once it
> bisected the commit yesterday but it should not be sending more?

I honestly find it hard to understand the resistence to fixing the
warning in mainline.

I merge such fixes aggressively.