[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200716073843.e7b1921aae962da9e5714fe0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 07:38:43 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Alistair Delva <adelva@...gle.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] bootconfig: Add value override operator
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:45:04 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 01:00:21 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > With this change, if the bootloader wants to change some value
> > in the default bootconfig, it doesn't need to parse the existing
> > bootconfig, but it can just append the new configs at the tail
> > of the bootconfig and update the footer (size, checksum and magic
> > word).
>
> I wonder if we should support multiple bootconfigs instead of updating
> the size/checksum/magic?
>
> So the end of the initrd would have:
>
> [data][size/checksum/magic][more-data][size/checksum/magic]
>
>
> And the kernel could do the following:
>
> 1. read the end of the initrd for bootconfig
> 2. If found parse the bootconfig data.
> 3. look at the content before the bootconfig
> 4. if another bootconfig exists, goto 2.
>
Yeah, that is possible. But since the total size of the bootconfig
is limited to 32KB (this means data + 1st footer + more-data),
I would like to give a chance of sanity check to the bootloader.
Thank you,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists