[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <245ecc65a839bd69413045ae5ee307ba03ca0869.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 16:59:02 -0700
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>,
lee.jones@...aro.org, dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/3] platform/x86: Intel PMT Telemetry capability
driver
On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 10:39 +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 14.07.2020 9:23, David E. Box wrote:
...
> >
> > +static int pmt_telem_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> > +{
> > + struct pmt_telem_priv *priv;
> > + struct pmt_telem_entry *entry;
> > + struct pci_driver *pci_drv;
> > + struct pci_dev *pci_dev;
> > +
> > + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>
> Thanks for supplying these patches.
> Are there any reasons not to expose this feature to CAP_PERFMON
> privileged
> processes too that currently have access to performance monitoring
> features
> of the kernel without root/CAP_SYS_ADMIN credentials? This could be
> done by
> pefmon_capable() function call starting from v5.8+.
The new capability is well suited for this feature. I'll make the
change. Thanks.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists