[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200715064220.GG32470@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:42:20 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@...data.co.jp>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] exec: Implement kernel_execve
> +static int count_strings_kernel(const char *const *argv)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!argv)
> + return 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; argv[i]; ++i) {
> + if (i >= MAX_ARG_STRINGS)
> + return -E2BIG;
> + if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> + return -ERESTARTNOHAND;
> + cond_resched();
I don't think we need a fatal_signal_pending and cond_resched() is
needed in each step given that we don't actually do anything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists