[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202007141826.8BA5C1E@keescook>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 18:26:31 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, hpa@...or.com,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cfir Cohen <cfir@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mike Stunes <mstunes@...are.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Martin Radev <martin.b.radev@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 28/75] x86/idt: Split idt_data setup out of
set_intr_gate()
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:08:30PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
>
> The code to setup idt_data is needed for early exception handling, but
> set_intr_gate() can't be used that early because it has pv-ops in its
> code path, which don't work that early.
>
> Split out the idt_data initialization part from set_intr_gate() so
> that it can be used separatly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists