linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] um: some fixes to build UML with musl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 01:47:58 -0700
From:   Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:     Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
        Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...udflare.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
        linux-um <linux-um@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] um: some fixes to build UML with musl

On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 9:02 AM Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 11:43 +0100, Anton Ivanov wrote:
>
> > Patch is OK with me, should not read patches before the 3rd double espresso next time.
> >
> > I will +1 it, Richard, Johannes, what do you think?
>
> I got dropped off the list in "The Great Infradead Purge" but I see it
> in patchwork ;)
>
> Not sure we should modify cc-can-link.sh without at least CC'ing
> Masahiro Yamada?
>
> But yeah, looks fine to me. Not that I have any interest in static
> linking.

Yeah, looks good to me as well, but I think the others here know the
drivers here better than I.