[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cf3aa171-fb75-b118-ea02-eb380b48b0cf@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:03:26 +0300
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: arch_k3: enable chipid driver
Hi All,
On 07/07/2020 10:02, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 01/07/2020 13.18, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 19/06/2020 19:25, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>> Select TI chip id driver for TI's SoCs based on K3 architecture to
>>> provide
>>> this information to user space and Kernel as it is required by other
>>> drivers to determine SoC revision to function properly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> index 8dd05b2a925c..1d3710e3626a 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
>>> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ config ARCH_K3
>>> select TI_SCI_PROTOCOL
>>> select TI_SCI_INTR_IRQCHIP
>>> select TI_SCI_INTA_IRQCHIP
>>> + select TI_K3_SOCINFO
>>> help
>>> This enables support for Texas Instruments' K3 multicore SoC
>>> architecture.
>>>
>>
>> Are there any comments?
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> Tested-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
>
>> The driver and dt changes were merged [1][2] and for adding new am654x SoC
>> revision SR2.0 we need this driver to be enabled always as other drivers
>> are
>> going to use SOC Bus API intensively.
>>
>> No dependencies.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200512123449.16517-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com/
>>
>> [2]
>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200613164346.28852-1-grygorii.strashko@ti.com/
>>
Any chances it can be applied for 5.9?
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists