lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a07943bf-fb7f-872d-4bc6-307bbaf57a3f@sony.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:03:19 +0000
From:   "Enderborg, Peter" <Peter.Enderborg@...y.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] debugfs: Add access restriction option

On 7/15/20 11:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 10:42:07AM +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
>> Since debugfs include sensitive information it need to be treated
>> carefully. But it also has many very useful debug functions for userspace.
>> With this option we can have same configuration for system with
>> need of debugfs and a way to turn it off. This gives a extra protection
>> for exposure on systems where user-space services with system
>> access are attacked.
>>
>> It is controlled by a configurable default value that can be override
>> with a kernel command line parameter. (debugfs=)
>>
>> It can be on or off, but also internally on but not seen from user-space.
>> This no-fs mode do not register a debugfs as filesystem, but client can
>> register their parts in the internal structures. This data can be readed
>> with a debugger or saved with a crashkernel. When it is off clients
>> get EPERM error when accessing the functions for registering their
>> components.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>
>> ---
>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         | 14 +++++++
>>  fs/debugfs/inode.c                            | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/debugfs/internal.h                         | 14 +++++++
>>  lib/Kconfig.debug                             | 32 ++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 97 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> index fb95fad81c79..805aa2e58491 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
>> @@ -827,6 +827,20 @@
>>  			useful to also enable the page_owner functionality.
>>  			on: enable the feature
>>  
>> +	debugfs=    	[KNL] This parameter enables what is exposed to userspace
>> +			and debugfs internal clients.
>> +			Format: { on, no-fs, off }
>> +			on: 	All functions are enabled.
>> +			no-fs: 	Filesystem is not registered but kernel clients can
>> +			        access APIs and a crashkernel can be used to read
>> +				its content. There is nothing to mount.
>> +			off: 	Filesystem is not registered and clients
>> +			        get a -EPERM as result when trying to register files
>> +				or directories within debugfs.
>> +				This is equilivant of the runtime functionality if
>> +				debugfs was not enabled in the kernel at all.
>> +			Default value is set in build-time with a kernel configuration.
> Naming is hard.  In looking at this, should "no-fs" be called
> "no-mount"?  That's a better description of what it does, right?

I think no-fs cover it better since it does not register a filesystem
but provides the interfaces. Mounting is then indirectly stopped.

The idea start with a check for mounting but it is much more
definitely stopped by prevention of register of the filesystem.
I can imagine to have a forth "mode" where it register a fs but
not allowing mounting. Such mode maybe useful for some runtime
configuration. But this patch is about boot time configuration.

> Then we can rename the bits to match the documentation so we aren't
> constantly thinking of different things and trying to match them up:
>
>
>> --- a/fs/debugfs/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/internal.h
>> @@ -29,4 +29,18 @@ struct debugfs_fsdata {
>>   */
>>  #define DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT BIT(0)
>>  
>> +/* Access BITS */
>> +#define DEBUGFS_ALLOW_API	BIT(0)
>> +#define DEBUGFS_ALLOW_FS	BIT(1)
> #define DEBUGFS_ALLOW_API	BIT(0)
> #define DEBUGFS_ALLOW_MOUNT	BIT(1)
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_ALL
>> +#define DEFAULT_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_BITS (DEBUGFS_ALLOW_FS | DEBUGFS_ALLOW_API)
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_NO_FS
>> +#define DEFAULT_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_BITS (DEBUGFS_ALLOW_API)
>> +#endif
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_NONE
>> +#define DEFAULT_DEBUGFS_ACCESS_BITS (0)
>> +#endif
>> +
>>  #endif /* _DEBUGFS_INTERNAL_H_ */
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> index 9ad9210d70a1..b609ad7c1343 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
>> @@ -476,6 +476,38 @@ config DEBUG_FS
>>  
>>  	  If unsure, say N.
>>  
>> +choice
>> +	prompt "Debugfs default access"
>> +	depends on DEBUG_FS
>> +	default DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_ALL
> default DEBUGFS_FS_ALLOW_ALL
>
>> +	help
>> +	  This select the default access restricions for debugfs.
>> +	  It can be overridden with kernel command line option
>> +	  debugfs=[on,no-fs,off] The restrictions apply for API access
>> +	  and filesystem registration. .
>> +
>> +config DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_ALL
> config DEBUG_FS_ALLOW_ALL
>
>> +       bool "Access normal"
>> +       help
>> +	  No restrictions applies. Both API and filesystem registration
>> +	  is on. This is the normal default operation.
>> +
>> +config DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_NO_FS
> config DEBUG_FS_DISALLOW_MOUNT
>
>> +       bool "Do not register debugfs as filesystem"
>> +       help
>> +	 The API is open but filesystem not loaded. Client can still do
>> +	 their work and readed with debug tools that does not need
>> +	 debugfs filesystem.
>> +
>> +config DEBUG_FS_ACCESS_NONE
> config DEBUG_FS_ALLOW_NONE
>
> Does that sound better?
>
> I'm not trying to be a pain, just trying to name this all correctly as
> it's messy with different config options and bits and mapping that to
> checks in the code without everything called the same.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ