linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used in call-backs should be static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200715101338.GA3165313@dell>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 11:13:38 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] cpufreq: powernv-cpufreq: Functions only used
 in call-backs should be static

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> On 15-07-20, 09:26, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> > 
> >  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:669:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘gpstate_timer_handler’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> >  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:902:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘powernv_cpufreq_work_fn’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> > 
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> > index 8646eb197cd96..068cc53abe320 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static inline void  queue_gpstate_timer(struct global_pstate_info *gpstates)
> >   * according quadratic equation. Queues a new timer if it is still not equal
> >   * to local pstate
> >   */
> > -void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
> > +static void gpstate_timer_handler(struct timer_list *t)
> >  {
> >  	struct global_pstate_info *gpstates = from_timer(gpstates, t, timer);
> >  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy = gpstates->policy;
> > @@ -899,7 +899,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
> >  	.notifier_call = powernv_cpufreq_reboot_notifier,
> >  };
> >  
> > -void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +static void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> >  {
> >  	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
> >  	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
> 
> Don't you want to drop this patch now ? As you already reviewed the
> other one on the list ?

Yes, please drop/ignore.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog