[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d0444ff.5c46.17352142e11.Coremail.zhixu001@126.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:45:21 +0800 (CST)
From: Zhao <zhixu001@....com>
To: "Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
"Greg KH" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rcy@...gle.com, rspringer@...gle.com, toddpoynor@...gle.com
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH v2] staging: gasket: core: Fix a coding style issue
in gasket_core.c
At 2020-07-15 17:04:06, "Joe Perches" <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 11:37 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:57:55AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:24:22AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 09:17 +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>> > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 07:44:40AM +0800, Zhixu Zhao wrote:
>> > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 12:11:27AM +0800, Zhixu Zhao wrote:
>> > > > > > A coding alignment issue is found by checkpatch.pl.
>> > > > > > Fix it by using a temporary for gasket_dev->bar_data[bar_num].
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhixu Zhao <zhixu001@....com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi, there~
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Does anybody have any further comments on this?
>> > > > > Can it be merged?
>> > > >
>> > > > I never saw the first version of this, are you sure it got sent to the
>> > > > mailing list? It's not in any archives anywhere.
>> > >
>> > > I saw it. It's here:
>> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200617161127.32006-1-zhixu001@126.com/
>> >
>> > Ah, doh, sorry.
>> >
>> > Zhixu, please address the comments given to you on the series and resend
>> > it as a new version.
>>
>> He responded but not as a reply to my email. It turns out I made a
>> mistake.
>>
>> Anyway, just resend, Zhixu.
>
>It's a pity a resend is being requested.
>
>It'd be a better process if the original patch could
>be applied via the link akin to a git pull.
>
Yes. All comments have been resolved by now. Patch v2 is sufficient.
As Dan said, there was a tailing thread because I mis-replied his mail.
I just now replied that mail with a reference to the final resolution mail.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists