[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb40545a8de8df8914df40d7d6167752c5244ce6.camel@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:12:29 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: "Saheed O. Bolarinwa" <refactormyself@...il.com>,
bjorn@...gaas.com, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...ux-m68k.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
Toan Le <toan@...amperecomputing.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@...el.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/35] Move all PCIBIOS* definitions into arch/x86
On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 13:45 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > fail for valid arguments on a valid pci_device* ?
>
> I really like this idea.
>
> pci_write_config_*() has one return value, and only 100ish of 2500
> callers check for errors. It's sometimes possible for config
> accessors to detect PCI errors and return failure, e.g., device was
> removed or didn't respond, but most of them don't, and detecting
> these
> errors is not really that valuable.
>
> pci_read_config_*() is much more interesting because it returns two
> things, the function return value and the value read from the PCI
> device, and it's complicated to check both.
.../...
I agree. It's a mess at the moment.
We have separate mechanism to convey PCI errors (among other things the
channel state) which should apply to config space when detection is
possible.
I think returning all 1's is the right thing to do here and avoids odd
duplicate error detection logic which I bet you is never properly
tested.
> > For b), it might be nice to also change other aspects of the
> > interface, e.g. passing a pci_host_bridge pointer plus bus number
> > instead of a pci_bus pointer, or having the callback in the
> > pci_host_bridge structure.
>
> I like this idea a lot, too. I think the fact that
> pci_bus_read_config_word() requires a pci_bus * complicates things in
> a few places.
>
> I think it's completely separate, as you say, and we should defer it
> for now because even part a) is a lot of work. I added it to my list
> of possible future projects.
Agreed on both points.
Cheers,
Ben.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists