[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200715120742.GD3165313@dell>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:07:42 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Grover <andrew.grover@...el.com>,
Paul Diefenbaugh <paul.s.diefenbaugh@...el.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...do.de>,
Denis Sadykov <denis.m.sadykov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] cpufreq: acpi-cpufreq: Remove unused ID structs
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 1:34 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:27 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 15-07-20, 08:54, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > > > > On 14-07-20, 22:03, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, 14 Jul 2020, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 4:51 PM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Can't see them being used anywhere and the compiler doesn't complain
> > > > > > > > > that they're missing, so ...
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Aren't they needed for automatic module loading in certain configurations?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Any idea how that works, or where the code is for that?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() thingy creates a map of vendor-id,
> > > > > > product-id that the kernel keeps after boot (and so there is no static
> > > > > > reference of it for the compiler), later when a device is hotplugged
> > > > > > into the kernel it refers to the map to find the related driver for it
> > > > > > and loads it if it isn't already loaded.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This has some of it, search for MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() in it.
> > > > > > Documentation/driver-api/usb/hotplug.rst
> > > > >
> > > > > And you just need to add __maybe_unused to them to suppress the
> > > > > warning.
> > > >
> > > > Wouldn't that cause the compiler to optimize them away if it doesn't
> > > > see any users?
> > >
> > > It looks like they're only unused when !MODULE,
> >
> > OK
> >
> > > in which case optimising them away would be the correct thing to do, no?
>
> It would be good if someone with a little more knowledge could provide
> a second opinion though. I would think (hope) that the compiler would
> be smart enough to see when its actually in use. After all, it is the
> compiler that places the information into the device table.
>
> If that is not the case, then the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE() magic is
> broken and will need fixing. Removing boiler-plate is good, but not
> at the expense of obfuscation.
Okay, I'm satisfied. This test build is without __maybe_unused:
# All configs built as modules (MODULE) - the compiler knows to use the tables
$ ccache make -f Makefile -j24 KBUILD_OUTPUT=../builds/build-x86 allmodconfig
$ ccache make -f Makefile -j24 KBUILD_OUTPUT=../builds/build-x86 W=1 drivers/cpufreq/
[...]
CC [M] drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.o
# All configs built-in (!MODULE) - the compiler sees that they are unused
$ ccache make -f Makefile -j24 KBUILD_OUTPUT=../builds/build-x86 allyesconfig
$ ccache make -f Makefile -j24 KBUILD_OUTPUT=../builds/build-x86 W=1 drivers/cpufreq/
CC drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.o
drivers/cpufreq/pcc-cpufreq.c:619:36: warning: ‘processor_device_ids’ defined but not used [-Wunused-const-variable=]
619 | static const struct acpi_device_id processor_device_ids[] = {
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists