linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND][PATCH] hwmon: scmi: fix potential buffer overflow in scmi_hwmon

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 07:55:52 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        jdelvare@...e.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] hwmon: scmi: fix potential buffer overflow in
 scmi_hwmon_probe()

On 7/15/20 6:00 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 01:13:38PM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
>> SMATCH detected a potential buffer overflow in the manipulation of
>> hwmon_attributes array inside the scmi_hwmon_probe function:
>>
>> drivers/hwmon/scmi-hwmon.c:226
>>  scmi_hwmon_probe() error: buffer overflow 'hwmon_attributes' 6 <= 9
>>
>> Fix it by statically declaring the size of the array as the maximum
>> possible as defined by hwmon_max define.
>>
> 
> Makes sense to me,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> 
> There may be other such instances. I am not sure if Guenter has ignored
> them intentionally or just no one has fixed them so far.

I am not perfect. No, I have not intentionally ignored anything,
and I don't recall seeing smatch reports (or this patch) before.

Guenter