linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] blk-rq-qos: remove redundant finish_wait to rq_qos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <73fa9772-9b02-fcfa-ea50-6779067ed70a@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jul 2020 09:32:33 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Cc:     Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@...wei.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        wangli74@...wei.com, fangwei1@...wei.com, ming.lei@...hat.com,
        josef@...icpanda.com, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] blk-rq-qos: remove redundant finish_wait to
 rq_qos_wait.

On 7/14/20 8:19 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 19:21:24 -0400 Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 09:56:25AM -0400, Guo Xuenan wrote:
>>> It is no need do finish_wait twice after acquiring inflight.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Xuenan <guoxuenan@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>>  block/blk-rq-qos.c | 2 --
>>>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/block/blk-rq-qos.c b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> index 656460636ad3..18f3eab9f768 100644
>>> --- a/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> +++ b/block/blk-rq-qos.c
>>> @@ -273,8 +273,6 @@ void rq_qos_wait(struct rq_wait *rqw, void *private_data,
>>>  		if (data.got_token)
>>>  			break;
>>>  		if (!has_sleeper && acquire_inflight_cb(rqw, private_data)) {
>>> -			finish_wait(&rqw->wait, &data.wq);
>>> -
>>>  			/*
>>>  			 * We raced with wbt_wake_function() getting a token,
>>>  			 * which means we now have two. Put our local token
>>> -- 
>>> 2.25.4  
>>
>> Reverting this commit fixed an issue that swapping workloads will stall for
>> days without being able to make any progress below.
> 
> I have reverted that commit from linux-next today.

Thanks, I'll revert it locally too.

-- 
Jens Axboe