linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] drivers/net/wan/x25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200716234433.6490-1-xie.he.0141@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:44:33 -0700
From:   Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] drivers/net/wan/x25_asy: Fix to make it work

This driver is not working because of problems of its receiving code.
This patch fixes it to make it work.

When the driver receives an LAPB frame, it should first pass the frame
to the LAPB module to process. After processing, the LAPB module passes
the data (the packet) back to the driver, the driver should then add a
one-byte pseudo header and pass the data to upper layers.

The changes to the "x25_asy_bump" function and the
"x25_asy_data_indication" function are to correctly implement this
procedure.

Also, the "x25_asy_unesc" function ignores any frame that is shorter
than 3 bytes. However the shortest frames are 2-byte long. So we need
to change it to allow 2-byte frames to pass.

Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
Signed-off-by: Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
---

Change from v1:
Added skb_cow before skb_push to ensure skb_push will succeed
according the suggestion of Eric Dumazet.

Hi Eric Dumazet and Martin Schiller,
Can you review this patch again and see if it is OK for me to include
your names in a "Signed-off-by", "Reviewed-by" or "Acked-by" tag?
Thank you!

Hi All,
I'm happy to answer any questions you might have and make improvements
according to your suggestions. Thanks!

---
 drivers/net/wan/x25_asy.c | 21 ++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/x25_asy.c b/drivers/net/wan/x25_asy.c
index 69773d228ec1..84640a0c13f3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/x25_asy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/x25_asy.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline void x25_asy_unlock(struct x25_asy *sl)
 	netif_wake_queue(sl->dev);
 }
 
-/* Send one completely decapsulated IP datagram to the IP layer. */
+/* Send an LAPB frame to the LAPB module to process. */
 
 static void x25_asy_bump(struct x25_asy *sl)
 {
@@ -195,13 +195,12 @@ static void x25_asy_bump(struct x25_asy *sl)
 	count = sl->rcount;
 	dev->stats.rx_bytes += count;
 
-	skb = dev_alloc_skb(count+1);
+	skb = dev_alloc_skb(count);
 	if (skb == NULL) {
 		netdev_warn(sl->dev, "memory squeeze, dropping packet\n");
 		dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
 		return;
 	}
-	skb_push(skb, 1);	/* LAPB internal control */
 	skb_put_data(skb, sl->rbuff, count);
 	skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, sl->dev);
 	err = lapb_data_received(skb->dev, skb);
@@ -209,7 +208,6 @@ static void x25_asy_bump(struct x25_asy *sl)
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "x25_asy: data received err - %d\n", err);
 	} else {
-		netif_rx(skb);
 		dev->stats.rx_packets++;
 	}
 }
@@ -356,12 +354,21 @@ static netdev_tx_t x25_asy_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
  */
 
 /*
- *	Called when I frame data arrives. We did the work above - throw it
- *	at the net layer.
+ *	Called when I frame data arrive. We add a pseudo header for upper
+ *	layers and pass it to upper layers.
  */
 
 static int x25_asy_data_indication(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
+	if (skb_cow(skb, 1)) {
+		kfree_skb(skb);
+		return NET_RX_DROP;
+	}
+	skb_push(skb, 1);
+	skb->data[0] = X25_IFACE_DATA;
+
+	skb->protocol = x25_type_trans(skb, dev);
+
 	return netif_rx(skb);
 }
 
@@ -657,7 +664,7 @@ static void x25_asy_unesc(struct x25_asy *sl, unsigned char s)
 	switch (s) {
 	case X25_END:
 		if (!test_and_clear_bit(SLF_ERROR, &sl->flags) &&
-		    sl->rcount > 2)
+		    sl->rcount >= 2)
 			x25_asy_bump(sl);
 		clear_bit(SLF_ESCAPE, &sl->flags);
 		sl->rcount = 0;
-- 
2.25.1