linux-kernel - Re: clean up address limit helpers v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:49:24 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: clean up address limit helpers v2

On Tue, 14 Jul 2020 12:54:59 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> in preparation for eventually phasing out direct use of set_fs(), this
> series removes the segment_eq() arch helper that is only used to
> implement or duplicate the uaccess_kernel() API, and then adds
> descriptive helpers to force the kernel address limit.
> 
> 
> Changes since v1:
>  - drop to incorrect hunks
>  - fix a commit log typo

I think this *is* v1.  I can't find any differences in the patches and I
was unable to eyeball any changelog alterations?