[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v9iothc1.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:49:02 +1000
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
To: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/pseries: detect secure and trusted boot state of the system.
Hi Nayna,
Looks good to me.
Sorry for not noticing this before, but I think
> +#include <asm/machdep.h>
is now superfluous (I think it's leftover from the machine_is
version?). Maybe mpe will take pity on you and remove it when he picks
up your patch.
Kind regards,
Daniel
>
> static struct device_node *get_ppc_fw_sb_node(void)
> {
> @@ -23,12 +24,19 @@ bool is_ppc_secureboot_enabled(void)
> {
> struct device_node *node;
> bool enabled = false;
> + u32 secureboot;
>
> node = get_ppc_fw_sb_node();
> enabled = of_property_read_bool(node, "os-secureboot-enforcing");
> -
> of_node_put(node);
>
> + if (enabled)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(of_root, "ibm,secure-boot", &secureboot))
> + enabled = (secureboot > 1);
> +
> +out:
> pr_info("Secure boot mode %s\n", enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> return enabled;
> @@ -38,12 +46,19 @@ bool is_ppc_trustedboot_enabled(void)
> {
> struct device_node *node;
> bool enabled = false;
> + u32 trustedboot;
>
> node = get_ppc_fw_sb_node();
> enabled = of_property_read_bool(node, "trusted-enabled");
> -
> of_node_put(node);
>
> + if (enabled)
> + goto out;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_u32(of_root, "ibm,trusted-boot", &trustedboot))
> + enabled = (trustedboot > 0);
> +
> +out:
> pr_info("Trusted boot mode %s\n", enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>
> return enabled;
> --
> 2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists