[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1594880123.69588.jingle.wu@emc.com.tw>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:15:23 +0800 (CST)
From: "jingle.wu" <jingle.wu@....com.tw>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-input" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
"phoenix" <phoenix@....com.tw>, "josh.chen" <josh.chen@....com.tw>,
"kai.heng.feng" <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: elan_i2c - Modify the IAP related functio
n for page sizes 128, 512 bytes.
HI Dmitry:
Just to confirm, the older devices (I assume that pattern 0 means older)
have version command that is numerically higher than the one for the
newer (pattern >= 1) devices?
>> Yes, Pattern 1, 2 are newer devices.
> @@ -324,7 +342,14 @@ static int elan_i2c_get_sm_version(struct i2c_client *client,
> return error;
> }
> *version = val[0];
> - *ic_type = val[1];
> +
> + error = elan_i2c_read_cmd(client, ETP_I2C_IAP_VERSION_CMD, val);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get ic type: %d\n",
> + error);
> + return error;
> + }
Could you please tell me why this chunk is needed?
>> Modify the old pattern IC firmware read the correct ic_type.
In the elan_i2c_core.c, move this code to elan_i2c_i2c.c.
static int elan_query_device_info(struct elan_tp_data *data)
{
.....
if (data->pattern == 0x01)
ic_type = data->ic_type;
else
ic_type = data->iap_version;
.....
return 0;
}
THANKS
-----Original message-----
From:Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:Jingle Wu <jingle.wu@....com.tw>
Cc:linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,linux-input@...r.kernel.org,phoenix@....com.tw,josh.chen@....com.tw,kai.heng.feng@...onical.com
Date:Thu, 16 Jul 2020 13:39:12
Subject:Re: [PATCH 2/2] Input: elan_i2c - Modify the IAP related function for page sizes 128, 512 bytes.
Hi Jingle,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 06:56:41AM -0400, Jingle Wu wrote:
> + if (!iap)
> + cmd = ETP_I2C_FW_VERSION_CMD;
> + else if (pattern_ver == 0)
> + cmd = ETP_I2C_IAP_VERSION_CMD_OLD;
Just to confirm, the older devices (I assume that pattern 0 means older)
have version command that is numerically higher than the one for the
newer (pattern >= 1) devices?
> + else
> + cmd = ETP_I2C_IAP_VERSION_CMD;
>
> - error = elan_i2c_read_cmd(client,
> - iap ? ETP_I2C_IAP_VERSION_CMD :
> - ETP_I2C_FW_VERSION_CMD,
> - val);
> + error = elan_i2c_read_cmd(client, cmd, val);
> if (error) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get %s version: %d\n",
> iap ? "IAP" : "FW", error);
> return error;
> }
>
> - if (pattern_ver == 0x01)
> + if (pattern_ver >= 0x01)
> *version = iap ? val[1] : val[0];
> else
> *version = val[0];
> @@ -298,7 +316,7 @@ static int elan_i2c_get_sm_version(struct i2c_client *client,
> return error;
> }
>
> - if (pattern_ver == 0x01) {
> + if (pattern_ver >= 0x01) {
> error = elan_i2c_read_cmd(client, ETP_I2C_IC_TYPE_CMD, val);
> if (error) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get ic type: %d\n",
> @@ -324,7 +342,14 @@ static int elan_i2c_get_sm_version(struct i2c_client *client,
> return error;
> }
> *version = val[0];
> - *ic_type = val[1];
> +
> + error = elan_i2c_read_cmd(client, ETP_I2C_IAP_VERSION_CMD, val);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to get ic type: %d\n",
> + error);
> + return error;
> + }
Could you please tell me why this chunk is needed?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists