[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f18d999-4518-31ce-4cea-9b5b89a577ad@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 09:45:55 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@....com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/page_alloc: fix non cma alloc context
On 7/16/20 9:27 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 2020년 7월 15일 (수) 오후 5:24, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>님이 작성:
>> > /*
>> > * get_page_from_freelist goes through the zonelist trying to allocate
>> > * a page.
>> > @@ -3706,6 +3714,8 @@ get_page_from_freelist(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags,
>> > struct pglist_data *last_pgdat_dirty_limit = NULL;
>> > bool no_fallback;
>> >
>> > + current_alloc_flags(gfp_mask, &alloc_flags);
>>
>> I don't see why to move the test here? It will still be executed in the
>> fastpath, if that's what you wanted to avoid.
>
> I want to execute it on the fastpath, too. Reason that I moved it here
> is that alloc_flags could be reset on slowpath. See the code where
> __gfp_pfmemalloc_flags() is on. This is the only place that I can apply
> this option to all the allocation paths at once.
But get_page_from_freelist() might be called multiple times in the slowpath, and
also anyone looking for gfp and alloc flags setup will likely not examine this
function. I don't see a problem in having it in two places that already deal
with alloc_flags setup, as it is now.
> Thanks.
>
>> > +
>> > retry:
>> > /*
>> > * Scan zonelist, looking for a zone with enough free.
>> > @@ -4339,10 +4349,6 @@ gfp_to_alloc_flags(gfp_t gfp_mask)
>> > } else if (unlikely(rt_task(current)) && !in_interrupt())
>> > alloc_flags |= ALLOC_HARDER;
>> >
>> > -#ifdef CONFIG_CMA
>> > - if (gfp_migratetype(gfp_mask) == MIGRATE_MOVABLE)
>> > - alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CMA;
>> > -#endif
>>
>> I would just replace this here with:
>> alloc_flags = current_alloc_flags(gfp_mask, alloc_flags);
>>
>> > return alloc_flags;
>> > }
>> >
>> > @@ -4808,9 +4814,6 @@ static inline bool prepare_alloc_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>> > if (should_fail_alloc_page(gfp_mask, order))
>> > return false;
>> >
>> > - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA) && ac->migratetype == MIGRATE_MOVABLE)
>> > - *alloc_flags |= ALLOC_CMA;
>>
>> And same here... Ah, I see. current_alloc_flags() should probably take a
>> migratetype parameter instead of gfp_mask then.
>>
>> > -
>> > return true;
>> > }
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists