[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbPNRoPGc4UCRZqhE52336d_LxT19A5y2oHK+hW-vn2ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 10:55:31 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] gpio: max77620: Use irqchip template
On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:12 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> wrote:
> + mgpio->gpio_chip.irq.chip = &max77620_gpio_irqchip;
> + mgpio->gpio_chip.irq.default_type = IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
> + mgpio->gpio_chip.irq.handler = handle_edge_irq;
> + mgpio->gpio_chip.irq.threaded = true;
And I didn't even realize one could do this.
> - gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested(&mgpio->gpio_chip, &max77620_gpio_irqchip,
> - 0, handle_edge_irq, IRQ_TYPE_NONE);
> -
(...)
> - gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip(&mgpio->gpio_chip, &max77620_gpio_irqchip,
> - gpio_irq);
And get rid of these two.
I suppose I can just do the same for the remaining users of
gpiochip_irqchip_add_nested() and gpiochip_set_nested_irqchip()
and get rid of these two functions altogether!
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists