[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87365r96iu.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 12:02:49 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Viktor Jägersküpper
<viktor_jaegerskuepper@...enet.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gabriel C <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, lwn@....net,
angrypenguinpoland@...il.com, Qiujun Huang <hqjagain@...il.com>,
ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Roman Mamedov <rm@...anrm.net>
Subject: Re: ath9k broken [was: Linux 5.7.3]
Viktor Jägersküpper <viktor_jaegerskuepper@...enet.de> writes:
>>> This bug was also reported on the thread where it had been posted originally:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20200621020428.6417d6fb@natsu/
>>>
>>> I am waiting for Kalle Valo to accept my patch (v2) which reverts the above
>>> mentioned commit and which looks correct according to him. He wrote that he
>>> would take a closer look at this as soon as he could.
>>
>> Mark posted a patch which I'm hoping to fix the issue:
>>
>> [1/1] ath9k: Fix regression with Atheros 9271
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11657669/
>>
>> Can someone confirm this, please? I would rather take Mark's fix than
>> the revert.
>>
>
> This fixes the issue for me.
Great, thanks for testing. I'll wait at least another day for more
comments and then queue it for v5.8.
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists