linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] um: allow static linking for non-glibc implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <159691324719ca79fbb8c206da527fc1f2bbc1ed.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:10:19 +0200
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>, jdike@...toit.com,
        richard@....at, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
        linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] um: allow static linking for non-glibc
 implementations

On Wed, 2020-07-15 at 21:11 +0100, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> It is possible to produce a statically linked UML binary with UML_NET_VECTOR,
> UML_NET_VDE and UML_NET_PCAP options enabled using alternative libc
> implementations, which do not rely on NSS, such as musl.
> 
> Allow static linking in this case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> Tested-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/um/Kconfig         | 5 +----
>  arch/um/drivers/Kconfig | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/um/Kconfig b/arch/um/Kconfig
> index 9318dc6d1a0c..beb98b3b9f75 100644
> --- a/arch/um/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/um/Kconfig
> @@ -62,12 +62,9 @@ config NR_CPUS
>  
>  source "arch/$(HEADER_ARCH)/um/Kconfig"
>  
> -config FORBID_STATIC_LINK
> -	bool
> -
>  config STATIC_LINK
>  	bool "Force a static link"
> -	depends on !FORBID_STATIC_LINK
> +	depends on CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC_NO_RUNTIME_DEPS || (!UML_NET_VECTOR && !UML_NET_VDE && !UML_NET_PCAP)

Come to think of it, in a way "FORBID_STATIC_LINK" was nicer because
there didn't need to be a single list of "what has dynamic dependencies"
like here the list of UML_NET_VECTOR, UML_NET_VDE, UML_NET_PCAP.

Maybe it could be

config MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS
	bool

config STATIC_LINK
	...
	depends on !MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS || CC_CAN_LINK_STATIC_NO_RUNTIME_DEPS


and then UML_NET_VECTOR et al can

	select MAY_HAVE_NON_STATIC_RUNTIME_DEPS

so that the knowledge is still distributed to the corresponding options?

johannes