linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: mt6360: Refactor and fix code style

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200716134406.GQ3165313@dell>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:44:06 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Gene Chen <gene.chen.richtek@...il.com>
Cc:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>, shufan_lee@...htek.com,
        cy_huang@...htek.com, benjamin.chao@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mfd: mt6360: Refactor and fix code style

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020, Gene Chen wrote:

> Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> 於 2020年7月13日 週一 下午6:48寫道：
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, Gene Chen wrote:
> >
> > > Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> 於 2020年7月13日 週一 下午2:51寫道：
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 07/07/2020 12:30, Gene Chen wrote:
> > > > > > From: Gene Chen <gene_chen@...htek.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rearrange include file.
> > > > > > Remove brackets around raw numbers.
> > > > > > Indicate sub-dev compatible name by using "-"
> > > > > > Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resouces into mt6360 regulator resources.
> > > > > > Rename mt6360_pmu_data by mt6360_data.
> > > > > > Rename mt6360_pmu by mt6360.
> > > > >
> > > > > That seems like a lot of cosmetics. Why is this needed?
> > > > > If you think that's needed it should be split up in different commits, each
> > > > > explaining in the commit message why you do that.
> > > >
> > > > Agreed.  This set is still not broken up enough.
> > > >
> > > > Please place each logical change into its own patch for review.
> > > >
> > >
> > > 1. Rearrange include file.
> > > After check serveral file about coding style, include file seems sort
> > > by architecture, not by alphabet
> > > 2. Remove brackets around raw numbers.
> > > Due to redundant brackets, another reviewer recommended to delete them.
> > > 3. Indicate sub-dev compatible name by using "-"
> > > Suggestion by Lees when review mfd binding document.
> > > 4. Combine mt6360 pmic/ldo resouces into mt6360 regulator resources.
> > > Simplify the similar resources object.
> > > 5. Rename mt6360_pmu_data by mt6360_data.
> > > Not only include pmu part, but also entire MT6360 IC.
> > > 6. Rename mt6360_pmu by mt6360.
> > > Same reason as above.
> > >
> > > We try to make code more simpler and easier to understand
> > > We can also discard changes if patch 1,2,4,5,6 doesn't make any difference.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
> >
> > Please place each on of these changes into their own patch.
> >
> 
> I list all topic and reason why we want to modify.
> Before split into patches, can we discuss which topic reviewer can accept?
> or I need fix first?

Fix first please.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog