[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200716142537.ecp4icsq7kg6qhdx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 16:25:37 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu/tree: Drop the lock before entering to page
allocator
On 2020-07-16 11:19:13 [+0200], Uladzislau Rezki wrote:
> Sebastian, could you please confirm that if that patch that is in
> question fixes it?
>
> It would be appreciated!
So that preempt disable should in terms any warnings. However I don't
think that it is strictly needed and from scheduling point of view you
forbid a CPU migration which might be good otherwise.
Also if interrupts and everything is enabled then someone else might
invoke kfree_rcu() from BH context for instance.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists