[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200717122740.59186df2@oasis.local.home>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:27:40 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Changbin Du <changbin.du@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/17] perf ftrace: add option '-F/--funcs' to list
available functions
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:21:16 -0300
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > Would you like to start contributing to that, and when we get the
> > libtracefs.so packed in distributions, we can easily create the
> > perf ftrace without having to rewrite the wheel 10 times?
>
> Or we can use as soon as it is available, not preventing 'perf ftrace'
> from having to wait for libtracefs.so?
>
> Duplication is normal at some point, Changbin is moving 'perf ftrace'
> forward, and has been doing this thru several patch series revisions, if
> we continue putting new requirements, it gets tiresome at some point :-\
We're finally at the point to move libtracefs.so and libtraceevent.so
into their own repository.
My fear is that the two will become incompatible, and forked forever.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists