[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKucSM7gqWmUtiBPbr208wB0pc25afJXc6yBQzJDZf4LSWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:28:13 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool,x86_64: Replace recordmcount with objtool
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 4:29 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 03:40:42PM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
>
> > > Not boot tested, but it generates the required sections and they look
> > > more or less as expected, ymmv.
>
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > index a291823f3f26..189575c12434 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> > > @@ -174,7 +174,6 @@ config X86
> > > select HAVE_EXIT_THREAD
> > > select HAVE_FAST_GUP
> > > select HAVE_FENTRY if X86_64 || DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> > > - select HAVE_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> > > select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> > > select HAVE_FUNCTION_TRACER
> > > select HAVE_GCC_PLUGINS
> >
> > This breaks DYNAMIC_FTRACE according to kernel/trace/ftrace.c:
> >
> > #ifndef CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_RECORD
> > # error Dynamic ftrace depends on MCOUNT_RECORD
> > #endif
> >
> > And the build errors after that seem to confirm this. It looks like we might
> > need another flag to skip recordmcount.
>
> Hurm, Steve, how you want to do that?
Steven, did you have any thoughts about this? Moving recordmcount to
an objtool pass that knows about call sites feels like a much cleaner
solution than annotating kernel code to avoid unwanted relocations.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists