linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool,x86_64: Replace recordmcount with objtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200717140545.6f008208@oasis.local.home>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:05:45 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] objtool,x86_64: Replace recordmcount with objtool

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:47:51 -0700
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com> wrote:

> > Someone just submitted a patch for arm64 for this:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200717143338.19302-1-gregory.herrero@oracle.com
> >
> > Is that what you want?  
> 
> That looks like the same issue, but we need to fix this on x86 instead.

Does x86 have a way to differentiate between the two that record mcount
can check?

-- Steve