[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <822de449-8c01-d790-a9f9-e8b513bd7f87@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 15:14:30 -0300
From: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna.hirschfeld@...labora.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, karthik.poduval@...il.com,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Eddie Cai <eddie.cai.linux@...il.com>,
Shunqian Zheng <zhengsq@...k-chips.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] media: staging: rkisp1: remove unecessary clocks
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your review.
On 7/17/20 2:49 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:13 PM Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> aclk_isp_wrap is a child of aclk_isp, and hclk_isp_wrap is a child of
>> hclk_isp, thus we can remove parents from the list.
>
> But it looks like it is the wrap clocks you are removing.
>From this binding yes, but the idea is to add in the dt wherever clock
responsible for the full ACLK path for instance.
In the example below, clock aclk_isp is ACLK_ISP0_WRAPPER.
Does this make sense?
>
>>
>> Also, for the isp0, we only need the ISP clock, ACLK and HCLK.
>> In the future we'll need a pixel clock for RK3288 and RK3399, and a JPEG
>> clock for RK3288.
>>
>> So with the goal to cleanup the dt-bindings and remove it from staging,
>> simplify clock names to isp, aclk and hclk.
>>
>> For reference, this is the isp clock topology on RK3399:
>>
>> xin24m
>> pll_npll
>> npll
>> clk_isp1
>> clk_isp0
>> pll_cpll
>> cpll
>> aclk_isp1
>> aclk_isp1_noc
>> hclk_isp1
>> aclk_isp1_wrapper
>> hclk_isp1_noc
>> aclk_isp0
>> hclk_isp1_wrapper
>> aclk_isp0_wrapper
>> aclk_isp0_noc
>> hclk_isp0
>> hclk_isp0_wrapper
>> hclk_isp0_noc
>> pclkin_isp1_wrapper
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in V4:
>> - update binding according to suggestion by Robin Murphy
>> on https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11475007/
>>
>> Changes in V3:
>> - this is a new patch in the series
>> ---
>> .../bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml | 30 +++++++++----------
>> drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c | 8 ++---
>> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml
>> index 4d111ef2e89c7..f10c53d008748 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-isp1.yaml
>> @@ -24,20 +24,20 @@ properties:
>> maxItems: 1
>>
>> clocks:
>> - items:
>> - - description: ISP clock
>> - - description: ISP AXI clock clock
>> - - description: ISP AXI clock wrapper clock
>> - - description: ISP AHB clock clock
>> - - description: ISP AHB wrapper clock
>
> This is the correct way to describe multiple clocks.
The idea was to prepare for rk3288 and rk3399 isp1, as suggested here https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11475007/#23462085
Or should we do:
clocks:
oneOf:
# rk3288 clocks
- items:
- description: ISP clock
- description: ISP AXI clock
- description: ISP AHB clock
- description: ISP Pixel clock
- description: ISP JPEG source clock
# rk3399 isp0 clocks
- items:
- description: ISP clock
- description: ISP AXI clock
- description: ISP AHB clock
# rk3399 isp1 clocks
- items:
- description: ISP clock
- description: ISP AXI clock
- description: ISP AHB clock
- description: ISP Pixel clock
?
>
>> + maxItems: 5
>
> Now the 4th and 5th clock are undefined.
>
>> + minItems: 3
>> + description:
>> + ISP clock
>> + ISP AXI clock
>> + ISP AHB clock
>>
>> clock-names:
>> + maxItems: 5
>
> This should not be more than the number of entries in 'items'.
>
If we follow what I wrote above, should we have:
clock-names:
oneOf:
# rk3288 clocks
- items:
- const: clk_isp
- const: aclk_isp
- const: hclk_isp
- const: pclk_isp_in
- const: sclk_isp_jpe
# rk3399 isp0 clocks
- items:
- const: clk_isp
- const: aclk_isp
- const: hclk_isp
# rk3399 isp1 clocks
- items:
- const: clk_isp
- const: aclk_isp
- const: hclk_isp
- const: pclk_isp
?
Thanks
Helen
>> + minItems: 3
>> items:
>> - - const: clk_isp
>> - - const: aclk_isp
>> - - const: aclk_isp_wrap
>> - - const: hclk_isp
>> - - const: hclk_isp_wrap
>> + - const: isp
>> + - const: aclk
>> + - const: hclk
>>
>> iommus:
>> maxItems: 1
>> @@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ examples:
>> reg = <0x0 0xff910000 0x0 0x4000>;
>> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 43 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 0>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_ISP0>,
>> - <&cru ACLK_ISP0>, <&cru ACLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>,
>> - <&cru HCLK_ISP0>, <&cru HCLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>;
>> - clock-names = "clk_isp",
>> - "aclk_isp", "aclk_isp_wrap",
>> - "hclk_isp", "hclk_isp_wrap";
>> + <&cru ACLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>,
>> + <&cru HCLK_ISP0_WRAPPER>;
>> + clock-names = "isp", "aclk", "hclk";
>> iommus = <&isp0_mmu>;
>> phys = <&dphy>;
>> phy-names = "dphy";
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> index f38801fea10d9..175ac25fe99fa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/rkisp1/rkisp1-dev.c
>> @@ -406,11 +406,9 @@ static irqreturn_t rkisp1_isr(int irq, void *ctx)
>> }
>>
>> static const char * const rk3399_isp_clks[] = {
>> - "clk_isp",
>> - "aclk_isp",
>> - "hclk_isp",
>> - "aclk_isp_wrap",
>> - "hclk_isp_wrap",
>> + "isp",
>> + "aclk",
>> + "hclk",
>> };
>>
>> static const struct rkisp1_match_data rk3399_isp_clk_data = {
>> --
>> 2.26.0
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists