linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/25] Documentation: watch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:50:27 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>, mchehab@...nel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/25] Documentation: watch_queue.rst: fix sphinx
 warnings

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:42:52 -0700
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:

> > -  * ``int remove_watch_from_object(struct watch_list *wlist,
> > -				   struct watch_queue *wqueue,
> > -				   u64 id, false);``
> > +  * ``int remove_watch_from_object(struct watch_list *wlist,``
> > +				 ``struct watch_queue *wqueue,``
> > +				 ``u64 id, false);``
> >  
> >      Remove a watch from a watch list, where the watch must match the specified
> >      watch queue (``wqueue``) and object identifier (``id``).  A notification
> >   
> 
> Wow. If that's what it takes, well, OK, but it's sad IMHO.

It seems like it might be better to remove the quoting altogether?  Either
that or just make a literal block.

jon