linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: uniphier-thermal: add minItems to socionext,tmod-calibration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQN04i14VwrWspTJ7+Y87rgsopv88Dyv_8+4Hk8Kx0Fdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:53:41 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Kunihiko Hayashi <hayashi.kunihiko@...ionext.com>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: uniphier-thermal: add minItems to socionext,tmod-calibration

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 07:23:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > As the description says, this property contains a pair of calibration
> > values. The number of items must be exactly 2.
> >
> > Add minItems to check a too short property.
> >
> > While I was here, I also added this property to the example because
> > this is the case in the real DT file,
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/socionext/uniphier-ld20.dtsi
> >
> > Also, fix the interrupt type (edge -> level) to align with the
> > real DT.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> > ---
> >
> >  .../bindings/thermal/socionext,uniphier-thermal.yaml          | 4 +++-
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/socionext,uniphier-thermal.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/socionext,uniphier-thermal.yaml
> > index 553c9dcdaeeb..57ffd0c4c474 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/socionext,uniphier-thermal.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/socionext,uniphier-thermal.yaml
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ properties:
> >
> >    socionext,tmod-calibration:
> >      $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> > +    minItems: 2
>
> The intent was if minItems is not defined, then the default is the same
> as maxItems. This is not the default for json-schema, so the tooling is
> supposed to add it.


This implication is unclear.

maxItems should literally only define the max, and
we should stick to json-schema as much as possible, IMHO.




It would be nice if json-schema had something like:

numItems: 2

as a shorthand for

minItems: 2
maxItems: 2


Masahiro Yamada




> But looking at processed-schema.yaml, it doesn't
> seem to be happening for one case here. I'm working on a fix in the
> tools.
>
> Rob



--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada