[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200717171634.4b68472c@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 17:16:34 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hanks Chen <hanks.chen@...iatek.com>,
Andy Teng <andy.teng@...iatek.com>,
Mars Cheng <mars.cheng@...iatek.com>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pinctrl tree
Hi all,
After merging the pinctrl tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:783:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
783 | arch_initcall(mt6779_pinctrl_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:783:1: error: type defaults to 'int' in declaration of 'arch_initcall' [-Werror=implicit-int]
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:783:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration
drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-mt6779.c:779:19: warning: 'mt6779_pinctrl_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
779 | static int __init mt6779_pinctrl_init(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Caused by commit
e6f744c6ad4f ("pinctrl: mediatek: add pinctrl support for MT6779 SoC")
Forgot to include module.h (since it is tristate in Kconfig) or init.h?
I used the pinctrl tree from next-20200716 for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists