lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:49:35 +0100
From:   Jonathan McDowell <>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <>,
        Matthew Hagan <>,
        Andrew Lunn <>,
        Vivien Didelot <>,
        Florian Fainelli <>,
        "David S. Miller" <>,,,,
        John Crispin <>,
        Rob Herring <>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: qca8k: Add PORT0_PAD_CTRL

On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:38:22AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 03:09:25PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 21:50:26 +0100 Matthew Hagan wrote:
> > > +- qca,sgmii-rxclk-falling-edge:	If present, sets receive clock phase to
> > > +				falling edge.
> > > +- qca,sgmii-txclk-falling-edge:	If present, sets transmit clock phase to
> > > +				falling edge.
> > 
> > These are not something that other vendors may implement and therefore
> > something we may want to make generic? Andrew?
> > 
> It was asked before whether this device uses source-synchronous clock
> for SGMII or if it recovers the clock from the data stream. Just "pass"
> was given for a response.
> One can, in principle, tell easily by examining schematics. If the SGMII
> is only connected via RX_P, RX_N, TX_P, TX_N (and optionally there might
> be external reference clocks for the SERDES lanes, but these are not
> part of the data connection itself), then the clock is recovered from
> the serial data stream, and we have no idea what "SGMII delays" are.
> If the schematic shows 2 extra clock signals, one in each transmit
> direction, then this is, in Russell King's words, "a new world of RGMII
> delay pain but for SGMII". In principle I would fully expect clock skews
> to be necessary for any high-speed protocol with source-synchronous
> clocking. The problem, really, is that we aren't ready to deal with this
> properly. We aren't distinguishing "SGMII with clock" from "SGMII
> without clock" in any way. We have no idea who else is using such a
> thing. Depending on the magnitude of this new world, it may be wise to
> let these bindings go in as-is, or do something more kernel-wide...

I don't have the schematic for the device I've been working with, but
the switch data sheet just shows 2 differential pairs (input/output) for
the SerDes Interface (whereas the RGMII interfaces *are* listed with
their clocks).


I just Fedexed my soul to hell. I'm *real* clever.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists