linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] rsxx: Convert to DEFINE_SHOW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jul 2020 20:16:33 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     miaoqinglang <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Joshua Morris <josh.h.morris@...ibm.com>,
        Philip Kelleher <pjk1939@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] rsxx: Convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE

On 7/16/20 7:37 PM, miaoqinglang wrote:
> 
> 在 2020/7/16 23:45, Jens Axboe 写道:
>> On 7/16/20 3:04 AM, Qinglang Miao wrote:
>>> From: Liu Shixin <liushixin2@...wei.com>
>>>
>>> Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code.
>> None of these apply against the 5.9 block tree, looks like some
>> read -> read_iter conversion has happened in another branch that
>> I'm not privy to.
> 
> Hi Jens,
> 
>      Sorry I didn't mention it in commit log, but this patch is based  
> on linux-next where commit <4d4901c6d7> has switched over direct  
> seq_read method calls to seq_read_iter, this is why there's conflict in  
> your apply.
> 
>      Do you think I should send a new patch based on 5.8rc?

That'll just create a needless conflict. But I don't even know what tree
is carrying the patch that changes it to use seq_read_iter, so hard to
make other suggestions.

Alternatively, I can hang on to them until the other change hits
mainline, and then queue them up after that.

-- 
Jens Axboe