linux-kernel - Re: [v2 1/4] coccinelle: api: extend memdup_user transformation with GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2007180841520.2538@hadrien>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:45:51 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        Denis Efremov <efremov@...ux.com>,
        Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 1/4] coccinelle: api: extend memdup_user transformation with
 GFP_USER

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:

> > Applied.
>
> Do you care for patch review concerns according to this SmPL script adjustment?
>
> * https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/5c0dae88-e172-3ba6-f86c-d1a6238bb4c4@web.de/
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/568

This one it complete nonsense.

>
> * https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/c3464cad-e567-9ef5-b4e3-a01e3b11120b@web.de/
>   https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/8/637

This on is indeed a problem.  I think it was not detected in testing,
because in the current kernel the rule never applies.  But Denis, in

-  to = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\)
                (size,\(GFP_KERNEL\|GFP_USER\|
                      \(GFP_KERNEL\|GFP_USER\)|__GFP_NOWARN\));

you do indeed need to put - in front of the second and third lines as
well.

Markus, if you would limit your comments to suggesting SmPL code that is
actually correct, ie that you have tested, and 2) stop suggesting stupid
things over and over like that putting all of the virtual declarations on
the same line would save space (it does, but who cares), then I would take
your suggestions more seriously.

julia

> Regards,
> Markus
>