[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <512ODQ.64YN0BEY1JJG@crapouillou.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 15:12:41 +0200
From: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, dongsheng.qiu@...enic.com,
aric.pzqi@...enic.com, rick.tyliu@...enic.com,
yanfei.li@...enic.com, sernia.zhou@...mail.com,
zhenwenjin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] clocksource: Ingenic: Add support for the Ingenic
X1000 OST.
Hi Daniel,
Le ven. 17 juil. 2020 à 10:02, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> a écrit :
> On 17/07/2020 08:13, Zhou Yanjie wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> 在 2020/7/17 下午12:20, Daniel Lezcano 写道:
>>> On 10/07/2020 19:02, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) wrote:
>>>> X1000 and SoCs after X1000 (such as X1500 and X1830) had a
>>>> separate
>>>> OST, it no longer belongs to TCU. This driver will register both a
>>>> clocksource and a sched_clock to the system.
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: 周正 (Zhou Zheng) <sernia.zhou@...mail.com>
>>>> Co-developed-by: 漆鹏振 (Qi Pengzhen) <aric.pzqi@...enic.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: 漆鹏振 (Qi Pengzhen) <aric.pzqi@...enic.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Notes:
>>>> v1->v2:
>>>> Fix compile warnings.
>>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>>> v2->v3:
>>>> No change.
>>>> v3->v4:
>>>> 1.Rename "ost" to "sysost"
>>>> 1.Remove unrelated changes.
>>>> 2.Remove ost_clock_parent enum.
>>>> 3.Remove ost->percpu_timer_channel/ost->global_timer_channel.
>>>> 4.Set up independent .recalc_rate/.set_rate for percpu/global
>>>> timer.
>>>> 5.No longer call functions in variable declarations.
>>>> v4->v5:
>>>> Use "of_io_request_and_map()" instead "of_iomap()".
>>>> Suggested-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
>>>> v5->v6:
>>>> No change.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/clocksource/Kconfig | 11 +
>>>> drivers/clocksource/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/clocksource/ingenic-sysost.c | 539
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 551 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/clocksource/ingenic-sysost.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> index 91418381fcd4..1bca8b8fb30f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -696,6 +696,17 @@ config INGENIC_TIMER
>>>> help
>>>> Support for the timer/counter unit of the Ingenic JZ SoCs.
>>>> +config INGENIC_SYSOST
>>>> + bool "Clocksource/timer using the SYSOST in Ingenic X SoCs"
>>> We usually use silent options and let the platform's Kconfig
>>> enable it.
>>> We show up the option only when COMPILE_TEST is enabled.
>>>
>>> Is there a reason to do it differently?
>>
>>
>> Do you mean
>>
>> bool "Clocksource/timer using the SYSOST in Ingenic X SoCs"
>>
>> or
>>
>> default MACH_INGENIC ?
>
> Both, no default here.
>
> eg.
>
> bool "Clocksource/timer using the SYSOST in Ingenic X SoCs" if
> COMPILE_TEST
>
> and
>
> in arch/mips/Kconfig in the config MACH_INGENIC section :
>
> ...
> select INGENIC_SYSOST
> ...
Disagreed. That's not how we do things on MIPS. Selecting MACH_INGENIC
means "this kernel will support Ingenic SoCs", but not that it will
only support these. Hence the depends on MIPS / default MACH_INGENIC.
As for the select INGENIC_SYSOST, this driver only applies to a few
SoCs, I certainly don't want it to be force-enabled. I don't even wait
it to be force-enabled on X1000, since it is optional there too.
Cheers,
-Paul
>
>> This driver has some origins from "INGENIC_TIMER" driver and
>> "INGENIC_OST" driver.
>> Early Ingenic processors used TCU (timer/counter unit, has 6 or 8
>> generic timer channels) to provide clocksource and clockevent (both
>> with
>> only 16bit precision). This part of the processor can only use
>> "INGENIC_TIMER" driver.
>>
>> Later processors provide an independent 32bit or 64bit timer channel
>> (still under TCU, known as ost channel, this channel can not
>> generate
>> interrupt) to provid higher precision clocksource. The "INGENIC_OST"
>> driver is for this channel. These processors can use "INGENIC_TIMER"
>> driver, but using "INGENIC_OST" driver to provide higher precision
>> clocksource would be a better choice (clockevent still needs to be
>> provided by generic timer channel of TCU, and still 16bit
>> precision).
>>
>> And the recent processors provide a SYSOST components, it is
>> independent
>> from TCU, including a 64bit timer channel for clocksource and a
>> 32bit
>> timer channel for clockevent. Although these processors can also use
>> "INGENIC_TIMER" driver, but the better choice is completely
>> independent
>> use of "INGENIC_SYSOST" driver to provide higher precision
>> clocksource
>> and clockevent.
>
> Ok, the rating should do the job then.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
>> You may have already noticed that this independent SYSOST component
>> is
>> like an upgraded and streamlined TCU, which only retains one generic
>> timer channel that can generate interrupts, upgrade it from 16bit to
>> 32bit, and then retain the 64bit ost channel. so the driver code and
>> Kconfig code of this patch is largely referenced
>> "INGENIC_TIMER" driver and "INGENIC_OST" driver.
>>
>> Thanks and best regards!
>>
>>>> + default MACH_INGENIC
>>>> + depends on MIPS || COMPILE_TEST
>>>> + depends on COMMON_CLK
>>>> + select MFD_SYSCON
>>>> + select TIMER_OF
>>>> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
>>>> + help
>>>> + Support for the SYSOST of the Ingenic X Series SoCs.
>>>> +
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM
> SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists