linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v16 21/22] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f162d78-2318-3d12-bbbb-1a47ed978bf7@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jul 2020 22:17:48 +0800
From:   Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 21/22] mm/pgdat: remove pgdat lru_lock



在 2020/7/18 上午5:09, Alexander Duyck 写道:
>> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> index e028b87ce294..4d7df42b32d6 100644
>> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
>> @@ -6721,7 +6721,6 @@ static void __meminit pgdat_init_internals(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
>>         init_waitqueue_head(&pgdat->pfmemalloc_wait);
>>
>>         pgdat_page_ext_init(pgdat);
>> -       spin_lock_init(&pgdat->lru_lock);
>>         lruvec_init(&pgdat->__lruvec);
>>  }
>>
> This patch would probably make more sense as part of patch 18 since
> you removed all of the users of this field there.


yes, I just want to a bit of sense of ceremony to remove this huge big lock. :)