lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200718161814.06844591@archlinux>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jul 2020 16:18:14 +0100
From:   Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     knaack.h@....de, lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/30] iio: dac: ad7303: Complete 'struct ad7303_state'
 doc and reorder compiler attribute

On Thu, 16 Jul 2020 14:59:28 +0100
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:

> Kerneldoc gets confused if the variable does not follow the
> type/attribute definitions.
> 
> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> 
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'vdd_reg' not described in 'ad7303_state'
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'vref_reg' not described in 'ad7303_state'
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member 'lock' not described in 'ad7303_state'
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c:49: warning: Function parameter or member '____cacheline_aligned' not described in 'ad7303_state'
> 
> Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>
> Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Holding this one pending that earlier discussion on whether we should
screen ____cacheline_aligned out in kernel-doc script.

Thanks,

Jonathan

> ---
>  drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c b/drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c
> index 15af8a1cce3eb..05d8dc88d4fad 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/dac/ad7303.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
>   * @spi:		the device for this driver instance
>   * @config:		cached config register value
>   * @dac_cache:		current DAC raw value (chip does not support readback)
> + * @vdd_reg:		reference to VDD regulator
> + * @vref_reg:		reference to VREF regulator
> + * @lock:		protect writes and cache updates
>   * @data:		spi transfer buffer
>   */
>  
> @@ -45,7 +48,7 @@ struct ad7303_state {
>  	 * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) requires the
>  	 * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
>  	 */
> -	__be16 data ____cacheline_aligned;
> +	__be16 ____cacheline_aligned data;
>  };
>  
>  static int ad7303_write(struct ad7303_state *st, unsigned int chan,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ